Master's Degree in Law
Academic year 2019-20
Degree data and benchmarks
Data updated on November 15th 2019.
Students
Data and description
| 2016-17 | 2017-18 | 2018-19 | 2019-20 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| New | 78 | 78 | 78 | 79 |
| SIIU New | 78 | 78 | 78 | 78 |
| Registered | 81 | 79 | 78 | 79 |
| Graduates | 79 | 79 | 76 | 80 |
New students: these students are starting their studies from the beginning for the first time. They may have recognised credits or not.
New SIIU students: these students are starting their studies from the beginning, registering on a programme for the first time and, in accordance with SIIU criteria, may have fewer than 10 credits (for a Master's) or 30 credits (for an undergraduate programme) recognised. This set of students may also be referred to as the optimum new entry group.
Registered students: these students have an active registration on a programme for an academic year. This set of students may also be referred to as the total student population.
- Registration reservations are not included (due to the students awaiting a place at another university or credit recognition)
- Registration cancellations are not included
- Students with unpaid debts are not included
Graduates: these students have passed (passed or accredited) all credits required for the degree programme and have, therefore, finished their course regardless of whether they have requested their degree certificate be issued or not.
Credits Taken and Passed
Data and description
| 2016-17 | 2017-18 | 2018-19 | 2019-20 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Degree Success Rate | 99 % | 100 % | 100 % | 100 % |
| Performance Rate | 99 % | 100 % | 100 % | 100 % |
Success rate: the percetage ratio between the number of passed credits and the number of credits taken for assessment.
Performance rate: the percentage ratio between the number of credits passed and the number of credits registered for.
Who directly oversees the quality of the degree programme?
Quality Assurance Commission
- Joan David Janer Torrens
- Antonio Conde Tejón
- Carlos V. Roig de la Cruz
The Quality Assurance Committee (CGQ) gathers all of the information regarding the degree programme (survey reports, data, statistics, complaints, suggestions, etc.) and analyses them. Here, you can see the regulations and duties of the Quality Assurance Committee (CGQ).
Commitment to quality
Suggestion/complaint form
Procedures for handling and revising incidents, complaints, and suggestions
Planning improvement measures
Accountability and transparency
Link to the Register of Universities, Centres, and Degrees (RUCT)
| Procedure | Document | Date/Year |
|---|---|---|
| Monitoring | External follow-up report (2017-18) | 29/11/2019 |
| Monitoring | Annual follow-up and internal assessment report (2017-18) | 19/06/2019 |
| Monitoring | Annual follow-up and internal assessment report (2016-17) | 23/03/2018 |
| Monitoring | Annual follow-up and internal assessment report (2015-16) | 23/06/2017 |
| Accreditation | Council of Ministers' resolution | 10/05/2017 |
| Accreditation | Final accreditation report | 04/04/2017 |
| Accreditation | Self-assessment report | 01/10/2015 |
| Monitoring | External follow-up report (2013-14) | 29/07/2015 |
| Monitoring | Annual follow-up and internal assessment report (2013-14) | 13/02/2015 |
| Monitoring | Annual follow-up and internal assessment report (2012-13) | 18/02/2014 |
| Verification | Implementation. Council of Ministers' resolution | 15/07/2013 |
| Verification | Official university degree statement | 29/11/2012 |